Home > August 2010

August 2010

Could you Quit the 'Big Three' in Internet?

Wednesday, August 11, 2010 0

Listening to “Tech Weekly” podcast on the Guardian website recently, right at the end of the show they asked the question; if Facebook, Google and Apple were to have a playground fight between themselves, who would win? None too surprisingly, each member of the podcast picked each of the companies for a variety of reasons.

Reading on TechCrunch today the question; “Are you mad enough to stop using Google? Can you even stop using it?” was asked. Both questions warrant a little further analysis in my opinion and I’m going to try to answer them both. First one first;

If Facebook, Google and Apple were to have a playground fight between
themselves, who would win?

Putting aside my dislike for Apple for a moment, they may be a big company, but they are not what I would call an ‘Internet company’, they are however a (self confessed) ‘mobile devices company’ (whatever that is!). They are also (not so self confessed), ‘closed software company’ in that they write operating systems that they rule with an iron fist and only the approved of the approved with a gold standard can enter into.

This undoubtedly puts them into a bit of an elitist position and it only takes a HP, a Dell, a Sony or some other technology company to produce a better device and the fashion will change. The problem with Apple is that they haven’t diversified enough in comparison to a company like Microsoft or Google and it seems the company continually revolves around one man; Steve Jobs, which is why they aren’t a clear winner in this fight.

Next up; search engine Google. Only they aren’t just a ‘search engine’ anymore, they are a mobile phone, emailing, social networking, online service and software, advertising company! This means they get a big tick in the diversity of business box and they are already a huge company that reaches into other people’s products and services as well as their own devices. However, the problem they face is that they may have perhaps moved away too much from their core business and inadvertently started fights with the other tech companies they came to rely upon (Apple for one), and that’s winning them no prizes moving forwards, especially as other companies such as Microsoft and Yahoo with Bing move in onto their core business (small numbers at the moment, but who knows what might happen).

Finally Facebook; this is a tricky one to assess. They have reached their 500 million users and no doubt have many more people signing up to the service each and every day. This means they undoubtedly have a lot of personally information on just about every single one of us – information and data equal value, in terms of what they can glean from what people actually post and ‘like’ on the site and what type of advertising they can tailor to us (much like Google does with Search).

Networking people together and allowing them to collaborate and ask questions and gain ‘crowd sourced’ answers provides a disrupted model to the traditional ‘Search Engine’ method of finding information. That doesn’t necessarily mean that search engines will die out, but Facebook has the potential to steal traffic in a big way.

The downsides for Facebook all revolve around privacy, security and history. Whilst the average Facebook user won’t be too concerned about privacy and security – those who perhaps understand Facebook and the Internet a little better are wary about the service and the value it does or doesn’t bring to each of our lives – looking at Facebook’s billion dollar valuation, its all based on the value of the price of each users data. In short, users equal money. The historical element of course is MySpace were in a similar dominant position only a few short years ago and somehow managed to lose out to a bigger and better network – with other social networks emerging, it only takes one of them to get the balance right and for users to flock to it to sink Facebook. What’s the likeliness of this? Probably not very high at all really, but it is a very real possibility (look at Twitter).

In my opinion then, based on these very quick and high level analyses, Google is my selection for winner. Which sets me up nicely for the second question;

Are you mad enough to stop using Google? Can you even stop using it?

Lets get one thing out of the way very early in this question, whilst it is very possible to stop using it (plenty of alternatives are available from rival companies), it would be very difficult to stop using it. I’ll freely admit that most of my ‘search’ is now done on Bing, I do find myself cross searching to Google if I fail to find out what I’m looking for on Bing (that’s not to say I then always find exactly what I’m looking for on either first time). Other people will undoubtedly using solely Google as their search engine.

This very blog is hosted on Google owned Blogger, my email is by Google. Some people’s phones are powered by Google Android (not mine however!), and I’ve no doubt that people use Google Apps, Google Earth/Streetview, Docs and Spreadsheets and other online Google services. All of which you can get from Microsoft and other such online vendors.

Would you ever switch to these products – yes, I believe some Google users would switch to these products if compelled to do so. Just as I’m sure users of Word Press, Hotmail, etc would switch to Google operated services.

Would someone be mad enough to quit using Google – I’m sure there are already some people out there who are suspect of Google’s already growing monopoly and avoid the companies products at all costs. Would I quit using Google products? I may quit one or two if another service became better suited to my needs (for example, if I was able to move my email to Microsoft Live Mail/Hotmail then I would consider moving if only to be able to use the “Mail” button on Microsoft Live Messenger and have that level of integration with my desktop apps, but this is purely as an example).

Would I quit all Google services forever and ever? I think it’s almost impossible for anyone to do so. They have diversified well and have so many offerings and services on their own devices and integrated into others (think mobile phones, as prime example).

To bring this post full circle, would I be mad enough to quit Apple/Facebook? I quit Apple two years ago quite easily. Facebook provides only a small amount of value for me as I prefer Twitter in all honesty, so if I was really motivated to do so, I could quit Facebook. Could I quit Microsoft? No, and for the exact same reasons I couldn’t quit Google.

The Passport To Education

Monday, August 9, 2010 0

Ever since he stepped down/backwards from Microsoft Bill Gates has kept me constantly inspired with his unique and new ways of looking at the most ordinary of every day problems and applying or reaching out for solutions to be found.

Thus far I’ve been following the ‘Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’ from a far via their website, but I think I really need to take a page out of BillG’s book and really start to expand my research and interesting to find out a lot more. A while ago I watched a TED talk from Gates on the subject of finding a way to produce cheap and affordable renewable energy for the poor; the premise being that if vast amounts of energy/fuel can be produced for a mediocre price, then the gap between the rich and the poor decreases in terms of living standards and what can be achieved, whilst also reducing the environmental risks and factors.

Truly inspiring stuff, yet absolutely straight forward thinking to what could be a very difficult problem to manage in the future if we as a collective don’t achieve it. On a slightly separate note, this past week I’ve read four separate articles on solar power and how the technology seems to be improving at a vast rate of clicks and as a result some people have some truly ‘big thinking’ projects on the cards. I even looked into the cost of my own solar panels in order to do my own bit and while the cost of panels far outweigh my own budget right now, I hope one day the price does alter and come down to allow more people to invest in these panels.

I do believe that by working in IT, you have a bit more of awareness in energy consumption and providing savings where possible. Data Centres are always a constant space for review in terms of how many servers that are crammed into these rooms, balanced off against heat and cooling with air conditioning units running 24/7 and providing backup power alternatives for all of these things. People responsible for these things tend to be pretty good at designing these types of rooms and coming up with solutions to keep the balance just right whilst at the exact same time keeping the amount of energy usage low and the cost of implementation down (or that’s certainly the case where I’ve ever worked).

But I’m getting slightly off track; last week Bill Gates closed the “Techonomy Conference” with a few more insights, thoughts and sources for inspiration to the world. The two that stood out (or at least the two things that were reported on TechCrunch), were education and latrines (obviously).

Now I don’t know too much about latrines and I’m not even going to start to speculate where or why one might want to start researching more – but the education thing kind of struck a chord with me. BillG reckons that in 5 years the best education will come from the Internet as the best lectures in the world will be hosted here, the stand-out problem is finding a way to recognise those who choose to learn from the web.

It’s a good point. As someone who never took the University education route ever since leaving college and going straight into work, a lot of my ‘missing education’ has been sourced from the web or from reading books and learning for myself. The problem for me is that these things cannot be officially recognised on my CV as I’ve never actually gained a qualification or attended a training course as such.

A quick browse through my book shelf you’d be amazed by how many business books there are – yet, up until last year I never had any sort of qualification in business studies (over a year and a bit ago I did an ‘Introduction to Business Studies’ with the Open University, a course which bored the living daylights out of me for two reasons, the structure of the course was far too restrictive and basic in comparison to some of the books I read – yet get no credit for).

Also on my book shelf are a number of books for social networking and the Internet; as you’d expect I know and understand the impact that companies such as Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, Google, etc all have on the modern world and how they interact with each other to create these digital eco-systems of the future now. Yet, my ex glided through a University Masters degree designed on the back of Social Media in Business (some of her course I actually broke down, understood and wrote for her – foolishly). Again, its something I know a lot about yet have no official credit or official recognition for when it comes to certification and applying for new jobs, proving my worth, etc.

The Open University in the UK is obviously a vastly important institution for providing part of this online Internet education – yet it’s not what Bill Gates is talking about in his vision of an ‘Internet education’. The OU courses are available at a price and some of the courses are quite highly priced too, especially when most of the content can be downloaded or found on the Internet for free (YouTube is always a good source of free information, as long as you’re not too distracted by the other videos on the site).

It’s a tricky challenge to tackle for sure, whilst some sort of ‘Education Passport’ possibly not too dissimilar from Facebook or Digg’s “Like” or “Digg” button respectively is placed on the bottom of articles and videos goes some way of keeping track of those things you’ve watched/read and learnt about, this poses two issues; remembering to press the button before you click a link to the next site and secondly, actually verifying that the user has actually watched/read and learnt something. The other problems include getting everyone to use such a service and having the educational institutions that participate and make the lectures free to the online community sign up to this single online educational online tracking program.

It’d be nice if Microsoft were able to develop its own ‘educational arm’ to the company, to run and operate such a web service and bring together these training/educational materials and manage user’s ‘education passports’. After all Microsoft was the company that brought us ‘Encarta’ that certainly provided a good source of educational material when I was a kid.

If it’s not Microsoft that does this, then this is the ideal project for some web start up to solve and develop such a platform; after all this is a far more attractive proposition than designing the next latrine….unless that’s really your thing.

What I Want From a Microsoft Tablet

Tuesday, August 3, 2010 0

There has been a lot of talk around Microsoft’s strategy on Tablet PCs. Microsoft say they are serious about the platform and their tie up with HP seems to confirm that its something that is definitely on its way, possibly along with a HP Palm WebOS version of the same tablet to compete head-to-head.

I’ll say the same thing about a Microsoft tablet than I did about the Apple iPad, why on Earth would anyone want one of these things? My view is that in order to justify purchasing a tablet computer, its got to have some sort of purpose in your life beyond it being just another cool, must have toy. I’m more than sure that a percentage of iPad owners didn’t fully think it through before they bought and now have a device that is sitting in a drawer after the initial novelty wore off.

I know this because I’ve purchased tablet PCs before – and whilst they provide an additional form of input (touch), that offers some unique interfacing options, what else is there really? An ebook reader? A portable media player?

So the question is how does anyone go about creating a tablet PC that won’t get shoved in a drawer or listed on eBay the second the user becomes bored with it? Well for a start, I think that Office is must. Without an Office suite it will never replace your trusty laptop and if it can’t replace your laptop device then why wouldn’t I spend my money on a better/quicker/faster/stronger/smaller/more portable laptop?

The next thing it needs to be able to do is provide more than just a ‘touch’ interface. Early reports that the ‘mouse’ is dead as a input concept for modern day computing, I don’t believe this is quite true. The mouse is still alive and kicking, because most people still need that level of precision for certain applications. The application I have in my mind right now is photo editing; a full colour tablet PC to me screams photography, as it’s the ideal platform for showing off those amazing photographs. Being able to manipulate and edit those photographs on the move may appeal to those photographers that like to work on the move – however, they will need someone more precise and far more accurate than the tip of their finger in order to achieve the desired results. Is the answer to that a stylus or a port for a mouse or both or perhaps even something completely new I’ve not thought of yet? Yes the device should work without these things, but the option to use them should also be available.

It needs to have ports and card slots. When the iPad came out, most peoples first impressions were that it needs to have a USB port or at the very least an SD card slot. Apple offered fiddly little plug-in thingies that allowed you to plug in an SD card reader via the ‘Apple port’ on the bottom of the device, but users don’t want to mess about with more plugs or extenders, they simply want to plug and play on the move. This means the OS has to be adaptable for whatever will plug into it, is that OS Windows 7 or do you only allow certain pre-approved devices to work with the tablet? I don’t know, but it’s an area which requires some thinking. Again, I can’t get rid of my laptop if I can’t plug my printer into my tablet.

The device has to span two different areas of my life; it has to provide everything I need from my home laptop, but it also has to be versatile enough for me to be able to use in the boardroom for taking notes on. This is undoubtedly a tricky thing to do, but there may be a simple way to achieve it by being able to shift between two different profiles or set ups; flick a button one way to load a ‘group policy’ which locks down your device to those provided by your companies network policies, flick the button the other way to remove those policies and have the device behave as unrestricted as your home computer. Any data transferred or stored in the ‘business profile’ is encrypted differently or marked as unavailable whilst in the ‘personal mode’, preventing company information from falling into the wrong hands. Again, I don’t know how anyone would achieve this necessarily, but I’ve seen iPads in the work place yet they just don’t work as they cannot interface with the companies Microsoft based network or data protection policies. Crack that problem and the device successfully wins two markets in one swoop.

Would I buy another tablet right now? No I would not. Would I buy a tablet in the future that is capable of doing all of these things and providing a purpose that I can buy into? Absolutely yes I would. Do I think this vision of a tablet will ever appear in the next couple of years? I’m not so sure, though I know that if Microsoft are as serious as they claim to be about building a tablet device for all users, then something like this would undoubtedly separate them from the iPad in a completely different user market and they could win big.

I would certainly consider buying one – but right now, I’ve not got the drawer space.

Schumacher: a Danger or a Legend?

Monday, August 2, 2010 0

There is little doubt in my mind that Formula One has changed a lot in the past 15-20 years. The heroes of the 90’s; Prost, Senna, Mansell were replaced by the likes of Schumacher, Schumacher and Schumacher come the 2000’s – alright, it wasn’t all about Schumacher I’ll admit, the names that stand out of course are Villeneuve, Hill, Hakkinen, Montoya, Alonso, Raikkonen but all of these drivers rather disprove my point (with the possible exception of Montoya), so I’ll conveniently forget about them for the moment.

Back in the 90’s Formula One was all about out right grit and wheel to wheel racing in what has became known as the “Prost and Senna” era. Last week popular British BBC show “Top Gear” they showed an item on Ayrton Senna and brought in commentator and long time racer/rival Martin Brundle for some analysis on Senna’s driving style. Brundle commented that Ayrton had a ruthless quality to his driving and would (and I quote), “position his car in a way that meant you either let him past or you’d have an accident. And he would leave it up to you decide whether to have an accident or not”. He also added “once you’d let him past of course, he knew that he’d get away with that every single time”.

So Ayrton Senna, the greatest driver who ever lived, was a ruthless racer who would push and fight for every inch of the track and strive to win at any costs. He really was a magical driver and ultimately focused on achieving nothing but a win; “I’m not designed to finish 2nd or 3rd, I’m designed to win”.

Come 1992 a young German pretender entered Formula One; a man named Michael Schumacher. Senna was his idol (as every driver’s idol is Ayrton), and he had the chance to race against him for two years, sometimes even racing and fighting for track position against one another and this was certainly the case come 1994, before Senna’s fatal accident and Formula One changed forever.

A raft of regulation changes were introduced for 1995, track layout changes were made to slow the cars down and safety procedures and equipment were introduced and made mandatory – all for the safety of the drivers. In my opinion, these changes could only be considered positive, especially when you look back at some of the accidents that have occurred in Formula One since and we’ve watched drivers walk away from them unharmed. But I’m getting off track here.

Schumacher was brought into F1 under a generation of racers who were taught to fight for every inch of track and to be tough and ruthless in achieving their targets and ambitions – and Schumacher has carried this mentality with him throughout his career, which as we all know has won him a legendary seven World Drivers Championships before his departure from F1 in 2006.

Between 1995 and 2009 not only have the rules changed and safety brought front and centre, but the driving etiquette and style has changed to reflect a more precision racing craft, the banging of wheel to wheel racing has over time been replaced by a more tactical and controlled method of racing where drivers are taught to know when to push and when to sit back and think through an overtake manoeuvre or concede another driver getting past if their nose is ahead moving into the next corner (the only driver who I can remember who didn’t race to these rules in recent memory is Juan Pablo Montoya who’s aggressive style earned him a reputation as a wild driver).

As new drivers who have entered the sport have adapted to this way of racing, perhaps only Schumacher from the 90’s era of driving has not changed his approach. The only other drivers from this era who are still around today are Rubens Barrichello and David Coulthard, but neither of these drivers have ever been accused of being ruthless racers at any point in their careers and it is perhaps for this reason why they have never been able to achieve the same success as Schumacher – a ruthless streak was required without doubt.

But Formula One has changed again between 2007 and 2009 whilst Schumacher has been away, dangerous manoeuvres no longer have a place in the sport and the business side of the event has taken over – teams would rather have their cars finish the race and have their sponsors shown off generating revenue than race with another car and end up off the road. Think about it, 2007 Kimi Raikkonen quietly won the championship without running anyone off the road or fighting hard for every overtake, Lewis Hamilton never went wheel-to-wheel and pushed and scrapped with Massa in 2008 and Jenson Button’s Championship in 2009 was fairly won by driving intelligently.

Schumacher’s return this year brought back some of that raw fight from the 90’s back into the sport – and the young drivers now in the sport are no longer afraid of the legend in the same way that Schumacher was never afraid to race the great Ayrton Senna. Schumacher’s Mercedes this year is viewed as a trophy prize for any new young driver in the fact that if they are able to overtake him, it somehow makes their value increase – who wouldn’t want to claim that they can race and pass a seven times World Champion legend?

The problem is that as a legend Schumacher cannot afford to look weak against these competitors, especially if he is serious about mounting bids for the World Championship over the next couple of years. As Senna discovered, once he’s gained that psychological advantage over his competitors, he could exploit it every time.

Which brings us to Sunday’s race and the challenge between Schumacher and former team mate Rubens Barrichello at end of the Hungarian Grand Prix? Lets face it, both of these drivers have vast amounts of experience to draw upon and both drivers know how each other operate inside a racing car and both know that there is a perceived ‘bad blood’ between them after their time together and Ruben’s outspokenness over his former Ferrari team mate.

The incident occurred at the end of one lap, leading into a new lap. Barrichello on newer, fresher tyres held the advantage as he closed in on the back of Schumacher’s Merc at a vast rate of knots, Schumacher’s car faulted coming out of the last corner onto the pit straight and looking at the footage you can clearly see Schumacher moving towards the right hand side of the pit straight. Barrichello in his slipstream clearly sticks with him and jolts to the right to overtake. From the camera looking down the pit lane, you can clearly see Schumacher’s head pointing towards his right-hand mirror watching for Barrichello’s move, which he is anticipating will be on his left, where all of the available track now is – Barrichello fails to recognise this and proceeds to push his way past on the right hand side of Schumacher’s car.

Schumacher then appears to squeeze Barrichello against the concrete pit wall – Ruben’s Williams finds just enough space to get through and make the overtaking move stick. As soon as Schumacher realises what is happening, his car moves to the left to both avoid contact and to be ready for the next right hand corner which is fast approaching.

What is clear to me that although the squeeze towards the pit wall looked dramatic from the onboard camera of Barrichello’s car, Schumacher who had been looking in his mirrors all the way down the pit lane has carefully left just enough room for a Williams to get past if the driver continues to make the overtake down the right hand side rather than opt for the overtake on the left.

The move by Schumacher was tough and it was ruthless and it was exactly the kind of move that I would expect from him – a defensive driving move straight from the Senna book of driving; either back off or you have the accident, you decide. The difference being F1 has moved on and will no longer tolerate such driving actions.

A ten place grid drop has been imposed on Schumacher for the next race as result and it sets a dangerous precedent in a sport that is desperately trying to bring back some of that close wheel-to-wheel racing that has been lost in this latest generation of drivers.

And once again, Schumacher has been labelled as the bad guy and a dangerous driver. Trust me; if I were racing in Formula One, Schumacher is one of only a few drivers I would ever place my faith in to leave enough room to complete that overtake, then again, I’d have overtaken on the left.



Not Perfect, But It's Mine....

Sunday, August 1, 2010 0

Two things are happening in my life right now; the first is that I’ve discovered and am loving the work of Mr Tim Minchin and the second, less important thing is that I’m in the process of buying my very first home.

Its an exciting, yet life changing process, and I’m looking forward to the time when have that space that I can call my own in just about every way. Already though I’m in that phase where I’ve been placed on hold, in limbo, quietly planning the change and waiting for the change to happen.

Anyway….I’ll cut to the chase, because all I really want to do is post this video of a Tim Minchin song that I’ve been unable to get off my mind since I heard it – it’s not perfect, but I like it.

Enjoy:


CraigButters. Powered by Blogger.